Media Coverage

Nepal’s Changing Political Landscape: From Party-Based Loyalty to Candidate-Centric Elections

The political scenario of Nepal remains highly unpredictable at present. As the nation inches toward the next general elections, the road ahead resembles a simmering pot with many noodles yet to be cooked before the final manifesto is served. The deep-rooted influence of conventional parties continues to shape the mindset of the Nepali population, yet shifting currents are becoming increasingly visible.

From Party to Candidate

Traditionally, Nepali politics has revolved around party loyalty. Voters aligned themselves with major political forces, often overlooking individual candidates. However, recent trends suggest a slow but steady departure from this pattern. People, especially younger generations, are beginning to value personal credibility, performance, and accountability over mere party affiliation. This indicates that future elections may be more candidate-based rather than strictly party-driven.

The Likelihood of a Hung Parliament

If the current electoral system remains in practice, Nepal seems headed toward a hung parliament. The rise of new political actors and independent candidates has fragmented the vote base. Instead of a clear majority, we are likely to see bargaining, coalition-making, and the emergence of “bargaining faces” who will play decisive roles in government formation. While this may lead to instability, it also reflects the growing demand for fresh leadership.

The Role of Conventional Parties

For conventional parties, this is both a challenge and an opportunity. Unless they adapt, rejuvenate, and bring forward candidates from Generation X and Generation Y, they risk losing ground to emerging forces. By selecting credible, younger, and more visionary leaders, traditional parties could still secure public trust and compete effectively in this new political reality.

A Moment of Transition

Nepal today stands at a transitional moment. On one hand, the legacy of party-based politics continues to dominate; on the other, a candidate-driven culture is gradually shaping the future. The outcome of the next election will depend not only on manifestos but also on the ability of individual leaders to connect with the people.

In the end, the Nepali electorate seems ready to redefine its political preferences. Whether conventional parties reform themselves or newer leaders take center stage, one thing remains clear: the coming elections will mark a turning point in the evolution of Nepal’s democracy.